CHEIL/1

Corpus Refs:Macalister/1945:321
Nash-Williams/1950:25
Site:CHEIL
Discovery:first mentioned, 1710 inc
History:Macalister/1945, 308: `This stone stood among the ruins [of the old chapel], and one Richard Evans attempted to appropriate it, with other stones, for building material. He was, however, stricken with blindness, a visitation, as he himself seems to have believed, for the act of sacrilege. Lewis Morris describes the monument as `a soft stone, which sometime stood on end, ye top now broke off' .'
Geology:
Dimensions: x x (converted from Macalister/1945)
Setting:Lost (present 1849, missing )
Location:Owen/1896, 140, reports that the stone was seen and recorded by Lewis Morris, and included in a list of stones included upon the fly-leaf of an edition of Geoffrey of Monmouth, which passed into his brother's possession upon Morris' death in 1765. The stone was last reported by Henry Rowlands in _Arch. Cam._1st series, iv, 264--265.
Form:plain
Condition:incomplete , n/a
Morris/1896, 140, notes that the top is fractured away.
Folklore:none
Crosses:none
Decorations:no other decoration

References


Inscriptions


CHEIL/1/1     Pictures

Readings

Radford, C.A.R. (1937):--]IACIT | [--]SORI[S^I]
Expansion:
[HIC] IACIT [--]SORIS
Radford/1937b cvi reading only
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):-]IACIT | [--]SORIS
Expansion:
[HIC] IACIT [--]SORIS
Macalister/1945 308 reading only
Nash-Williams, V.E. (1950):--]IACIT | [--]SORIS
Expansion:
[HIC] IACIT [--]SORIS
Translation:
Here lies [So-and-so] (PN) son (?) of...[--]sor (PN).
Expansion:
(HIC) IACIT (-) (UX)SORIS
Translation:
(The stone of So-and-so). Here she lies, wife (of So-and-so).
Nash-Williams/1950 59 reading only

Notes

Orientation:vertical up
Position:inc ; broad ; inc ; undecorated
Incision:n/a
Date:500 - 599 (Radford/1937b)
Radford/1937b, cvi: `The letters are Roman with the O smaller than those on either side, a feature which begins in the 5th century in Gaul...straggling form of the S and the debased R...Date 6th century'.
400 - 533 (Nash-Williams/1950)
Language:Latin (rcaps)
Ling. Notes:none
Paleo. Notes:Radford/1937b, cvi: `The letters are Roman with the O smaller than those on either side, a feature which begins in the 5th century in Gaul'.

Nash-Williams/1950, 59: `Roman capitals. The R had an open bow and short tail'.

Legibility:inc
Lines:2
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References