XClose

The Bartlett School of Planning

Home
Menu

Appealing Design: The evidence of planning appeals

This landmark study provided evidence that planning authorities need to confidently pursue their local design aspirations as a full and integral part of their planning mission.

A map marker showing rows of illustrations of homes

1 April 2024

Overview

For decades local planning authorities up and down the country have been reluctant to refuse poorly designed residential and other developments on design grounds:

  • Design was seen as too subjective, potentially opening up planning judgements to challenge
  • Quantity not quality was prioritised in national policy and decision-making
  • Housebuilders were seen as too formidable and eventually wear local planning authorities down
  • Good design took too long to negotiate, time which already stretched planning officers didn’t have
  • Design was too often an afterthought with outline applications limiting what could subsequently be achieved in design terms
  • Cash strapped local planning authorities feared costs being awarded against them for refusing on design grounds.

Drawing on recent planning appeals data, Appealing Design sought to test whether these perceptions were valid in the light of policy changes in the NPPF dating from July 20 2021. The research used a simple content analysis methodology to examine Inspector’s reports and associated appeal documentation in around half the major appeals heard in England in 2021. From this sample, those that primarily focussed on design were singled out for investigation and analysis. Pre and post-revision appeals were compared, and findings were examined against historic data on planning appeals.

In concluding that none of the six perceptions are any longer true, this landmark study provided the evidence that planning authorities need to confidently pursue their local design aspirations as a full and integral part of their planning mission.

This project ran from November 2021 to April 2022. 

People

Professor Matthew Carmona (Lead PI), The Bartlett School of Planning
Send Matthew an email
View Matthew's profile

Valentina Giordano, The Bartlett School of Planning
Send Valentina an email
View Valentina's profile

Funders

Civic Voice
Visit the Civic Voice website

Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI)
Visit the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) website

Urban Design Group
Visit the Urban Design Group website

Urban Design Learning
Visit the Urban Design Learning website

Outputs

Carmona M & Giordano V (2021) Appealing Design, The evidence of Planning Appeals and the Need to Reject Poor and Mediocre Design, London, Place Alliance, http://placealliance.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Place-Alliance-Appealing-Design_2022-Final.pdf

The work was awarded the RTPI 2022 Sir Peter Hall Award for Excellence in Research and Engagement.

Related links

Visit the Place Alliance website
Follow Professor Matthew Carmona on X (formerly Twitter)
Follow Valentina Giordano on X (formerly Twitter)
Follow Place Alliance on X (formerly Twitter)
Follow The Bartlett School of Planning on X (formerly Twitter)
Follow The Bartlett School of Planning on LinkedIn

Go back to view all research projects

Photo by Matthew Carmona